CrashFu on Tumblr

I think cats have gender differences in their personality, but it’s way different than people gender (which is to a large degree artificial).

Like boy cats tend to be big lazy doofs? And they’re really friendly?

And girl cats seem to have a little more self-respect? Y’know what I mean?

It’s… a very subtle difference. Maybe I’m just imagining it?

When movies dub cat and dog sounds over the quiet-ass cats and dogs on screen it’s the funniest thing to me.

Logan’s Run spoilers ahead

Read More

susemoji:

gaypee:

animalsandtrees:

"Very important. General rule for English speakers - if you don’t do it in the human context, don’t do it in the nonhuman context.
Just make a little effort to say “she or he” or “her or him” if you don’t know the sex. It’s a little effort with a very important social message.
Nonhuman animals are *persons*, not *things*. Therefore, we should refer to a nonhuman animal as a “she” or “he,” never as an “it.””



Bye

Or maybe most animals don’t give as much of a fuck about gender as people do?
Maybe they just be whatever animal they are until its time to breed. Maybe they’re too busy surviving to care about gender roles.

susemoji:

gaypee:

animalsandtrees:

"Very important. General rule for English speakers - if you don’t do it in the human context, don’t do it in the nonhuman context.

Just make a little effort to say “she or he” or “her or him” if you don’t know the sex. It’s a little effort with a very important social message.

Nonhuman animals are *persons*, not *things*. Therefore, we should refer to a nonhuman animal as a “she” or “he,” never as an “it.””

image

Bye

Or maybe most animals don’t give as much of a fuck about gender as people do?

Maybe they just be whatever animal they are until its time to breed. Maybe they’re too busy surviving to care about gender roles.

Logan’s Run

I’m actually watching Logan’s Run for the first time, or as I’ve dubbed it: “almost naked people and sometimes lazers: the movie”.

Input Requested from Trans/Nonbinary Folk

Having a lack of understanding really bothers me, so I’d like to ask some questions to any transgender or non-binary gender people willing to offer their input to some random confused guy on tumblr.  This excludes people who simply feel that gender isn’t a big part of their identity in the first place (I understand you just fine).

My questions are as follows:

  1. Philosophically, can you identify yourself as NOT being X if you can’t define what X is to begin with?
  2. If, rather, your identification is based on what you ARE rather than what you are not, then do you believe that X and Y cannot both be attributed the same qualities?
  3. If X and Y  CAN both have the same qualities, then why, in your own words, DO you identify as one over the other? 

If anyone would be willing to offer their input, they can send it to me via ask, anonymously or otherwise.  I don’t currently intend to post any of the asks publicly, as I’m just looking for information, but I’d be sure to ask permission first if I DID want to publish a reply or some-such.

I don’t really expect anyone to volunteer, but I appreciate in advance anyone who does.

(P.S. sorry for the excess of tags)

caffenespeaks:

think-progress:

“If babies had guns…”

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? 

caffenespeaks:

think-progress:

“If babies had guns…”

WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? 

( Hold the phone, play the DLCs. Motor Momma is a large in charge black woman who rides a motor cycle. Also Ellie is a large woman, and damn happy with it. Salvador uses Spanish, and so does Mordecai. The Savages from Hammerlock's DLC are all Black. Not to mention all the midgets. So... yeah. )

I thought about those characters, and that’s why I said “Almost all”.  Ellie was a great character, especially with the hinted-at issues other people had with her weight and her not being ashamed of it.  Motor Momma was… just a re-skin of Ellie. Who ate people. And wasn’t very consequential in that you only hear of her just before fighting her and then she’s, well… dead. Mostly all she accomplished was character development for Moxxi (confirming beyond a shadow of the doubt that Moxxi was bisexual and wasn’t bothered by a prospective partner’s weight)

Salvador does have an accent, so I guuuueeeesss that makes him non-white? Really, the most defining characteristic of Salvador to me was always that he’s the only vault hunter to actually be native to the planet.

The “savage tribal african” stereotypes in Hammerlock’s DLC and the ongoing comic-relief cannon fodder midgets aren’t very good examples to bring up. :I

On one hand, I like how progressive the Borderlands franchise is regarding gender and sexuality.

On the other hand, almost all the characters are white, and almost all of the female characters, especially, are skinny, pretty, AND white.

Like, overall I respect the franchise and its developers a lot, but it’s so weird to be all progressive in a couple ways and then not even make an effort in others?

america-wakiewakie:

Princeton Concludes What Kind of Government America Really Has, and It’s Not a Democracy | PolicyMic 
The news: A new scientific study from Princeton researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page has finally put some science behind the recently popular argument that the United States isn’t a democracy any more. And they’ve found that in fact, America is basically an oligarchy.
An oligarchy is a system where power is effectively wielded by a small number of individuals defined by their status called oligarchs. Members of the oligarchy are the rich, the well connected and the politically powerful, as well as particularly well placed individuals in institutions like banking and finance or the military.
For their study, Gilens and Page compiled data from roughly 1,800 different policy initiatives in the years between 1981 and 2002. They then compared those policy changes with the expressed opinion of the United State public. Comparing the preferences of the average American at the 50th percentile of income to what those Americans at the 90th percentile preferred, as well as the opinions of major lobbying or business groups, the researchers found out that the government followed the directives set forth by the latter two much more often.
It’s beyond alarming. As Gilens and Page write, “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.” In other words, their statistics say your opinion literally does not matter.
That might explain why mandatory background checks on gun sales supported by 83% to 91% of Americans aren’t in place, or why Congress has taken no action on greenhouse gas emissions even when such legislation is supported by the vast majority of citizens.
This problem has been steadily escalating for four decades. While there are some limitations to their data set, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez constructed income statistics based on IRS data that go back to 1913. They found that the gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us is much bigger than you would think…
(Read Full Text)

america-wakiewakie:

Princeton Concludes What Kind of Government America Really Has, and It’s Not a Democracy | PolicyMic 

The news: A new scientific study from Princeton researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page has finally put some science behind the recently popular argument that the United States isn’t a democracy any more. And they’ve found that in fact, America is basically an oligarchy.

An oligarchy is a system where power is effectively wielded by a small number of individuals defined by their status called oligarchs. Members of the oligarchy are the rich, the well connected and the politically powerful, as well as particularly well placed individuals in institutions like banking and finance or the military.

For their study, Gilens and Page compiled data from roughly 1,800 different policy initiatives in the years between 1981 and 2002. They then compared those policy changes with the expressed opinion of the United State public. Comparing the preferences of the average American at the 50th percentile of income to what those Americans at the 90th percentile preferred, as well as the opinions of major lobbying or business groups, the researchers found out that the government followed the directives set forth by the latter two much more often.

It’s beyond alarming. As Gilens and Page write, “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.” In other words, their statistics say your opinion literally does not matter.

That might explain why mandatory background checks on gun sales supported by 83% to 91% of Americans aren’t in place, or why Congress has taken no action on greenhouse gas emissions even when such legislation is supported by the vast majority of citizens.

This problem has been steadily escalating for four decades. While there are some limitations to their data set, economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez constructed income statistics based on IRS data that go back to 1913. They found that the gap between the ultra-wealthy and the rest of us is much bigger than you would think…

(Read Full Text)